Section 16 / 22Light-touch decisions in a fast-paced culture
Export full PDFStakeholder & Governance
Light-touch decisions in a fast-paced culture
Governance sized to the environment: fast, personal and light-touch. No RAID theatre, no 40-slide steer decks. A one-page plan, a live RAID and 30-minute forums, run with candour.
Governance layers
Five forums, no more
| Forum | Chair | Cadence | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Executive Steer | CEO / Sponsor | Fortnightly (30 min) | Strategic direction, decisions, budget control, blockers I can't clear |
| 2Delivery Standup | Project Manager | 3x per week (15 min) | Task-level progress, defects, next 48 hours, live RAID |
| 3Vendor Delivery Forum | Project Manager | Weekly | Vendor progress vs SOW, defects, change requests, next milestones |
| 4Bulgaria Bid Team Sync | Bid Team Lead | Weekly | Confidence, questions, training gaps, adoption signals |
| 5Country Leads Call | Project Manager | Fortnightly post-Sep | Rollout readiness across 14 countries, feedback into central backlog |
Stakeholder map
Influence vs interest
Engagement intensity matched to each stakeholder's role in getting to 30 Sept and rolling out to 14 countries.
Manage closely
High influence · High interestCEOExecutive SponsorBulgaria Bid Team LeadIT LeadSelected Vendor Lead
Keep satisfied
High influence · Lower interestCFOGroup Commercial LeadDPO
Keep informed
Lower influence · High interestCountry Leads (14)Bid contributorsFinance business partnerSales operations
Monitor
Lower influence · Lower interestLosing vendorsAdjacent internal teamsWider IT
Decision rights
RACI for the seven biggest decisions
| Decision | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements sign-off | Project Manager | Executive Sponsor | Bid Team Lead, IT | Country Leads |
| Vendor selection | Project Manager | CEO | IT, Finance, Bid Team Lead | Country Leads |
| Configuration decisions | Vendor + PM | Project Manager | Bid Team Lead | Executive Sponsor |
| Data migration cut & sign-off | Project Manager | Bid Team Lead | Vendor, IT, DPO | Executive Sponsor |
| Go / no-go for 30 Sept | Project Manager | CEO | Bid Team Lead, Vendor, IT | Country Leads |
| Rollout wave sequencing | Project Manager | Executive Sponsor | Country Leads | Vendor |
| Budget change > 5% | Project Manager | Executive Sponsor | CFO, Vendor | CEO |
Escalation
From standup to CEO in four steps
L1
Squad member → PM
Task blocker, config query, defect
Same dayL2
Project Manager
Vendor issue, scope query, cross-team blocker
Within 24 hoursL3
Executive Sponsor
Material risk, change request, budget variance >5%
Next fortnightly steerL4
CEO
30 Sept date at risk, contractual issue, reputational risk
ImmediateProgramme artefacts
What we maintain
- One-page delivery plan
- Live RAID log
- Decision log
- Budget tracker
- Vendor scorecard
- Adoption dashboard
- Reconciliation pack (migration)
- Post-implementation review
Operating principles
How this governance behaves
- Decisions logged, dated and owned. No decisions in inboxes.
- One-page delivery plan, updated weekly, seen by everyone.
- Vendor governed against SOW milestones, not goodwill.
- Escalations have SLAs. Silence is not acceptable.
- Country leads have a voice on config, not a veto on go-live.
- 30 September is the boundary, not the aspiration.